Professional tierWireless streamLab-first · Rubric-graded

RCWPRKR Certified Wireless Professional

Design, secure and validate enterprise Wi-Fi the way it is actually deployed — survey rig in hand, capture running, SLA on the line.

14 weeks9 hrs / week8 modules18 labsPrerequisite: RCWA

Overview

What the RCWP certifies.

The RKR Certified Wireless Professional (RCWP) is the design-and-delivery tier of RKR's wireless track. Where RCWA proved you can configure and operate a WLAN, RCWP proves you can be handed a floor plan, a client mix and a set of business requirements — and return a defensible, validated wireless design. The program is built around the full professional workflow: RF math and spectrum analysis, predictive modelling in Ekahau AI Pro, AP-on-a-stick and passive/active validation surveys, high-density capacity engineering for auditoriums and dense offices, WPA3-Enterprise with 802.1X/EAP against a real RADIUS/NAC stack, fast secure roaming with 802.11r/k/v, and QoS/WMM engineering for voice and real-time applications. Every claim you make in a design document, you prove with a measurement or a packet capture.

RCWP exists because India's infrastructure build-out is running ahead of its talent pipeline. As GCCs, hyperscale campuses and Industry 4.0 plants standardise on Wi-Fi 6E/7 as primary access — and as AI-era operations automate away generic device-babysitting roles — the people who remain valuable are the ones who can engineer RF, not just click through a controller UI. RCWP is deliberately comparable in rigor to Aruba ACMP and CWNP CWDP, but it is RKR-owned, lab-first and assessed on demonstrable output: your certification is backed by a graded design package, survey data and captures that an employer can verify, not a watch-time certificate.

Measurable outcomes

Walk out able to do this — on record.

Learner can produce a complete predictive WLAN design in Ekahau AI Pro from a floor plan and requirements document, with defensible AP placement, channel and power plans for 2.4/5/6 GHz

Learner can execute AP-on-a-stick, passive and active validation surveys and reconcile measured data against the predictive model

Learner can engineer high-density coverage for auditoriums, training floors and open offices using airtime, channel-reuse and cell-sizing math — not rules of thumb

Learner can deploy WPA3-Enterprise with 802.1X/EAP-TLS end to end, including RADIUS (ClearPass) policy, PKI enrolment and role-based access

Learner can enable, capture and prove fast secure roaming (802.11r/k/v) behaviour and diagnose sticky-client and roaming-failure cases from packet captures

Learner can design and verify end-to-end QoS for voice/video over Wi-Fi, mapping WMM access categories to wired DSCP and validating with live call testing

Learner can author a professional design-and-validation report that survives technical scrutiny from a customer or architect

Who it’s for

Built for these starting lines.

RCWA graduates or working network engineers with 1-3 years of WLAN operations experience ready to move into design and delivery roles

Enterprise/campus network engineers at GCCs, SIs and managed-service providers who are handed Wi-Fi projects but have never been trained on survey methodology

Engineers preparing for Aruba ACMP or CWNP CWDP who want graded, hands-on proof of competence rather than exam-cram theory

System integrator field engineers who deploy APs today and want to own the design, security and validation phases of the project lifecycle

IT professionals pivoting out of automatable generalist roles into a defensible RF/wireless specialisation

The syllabus

8 modules. 18 graded labs. No filler.

Every module terminates in a graded lab — theory is never left unproven. This is the full RCWP module sequence, exactly as delivered.

RCWP-M01

Advanced RF Engineering & Spectrum Analysis

The math and measurement layer everything else stands on. You work in dBm/dBi/EIRP natively, build link budgets that account for FSPL, wall attenuation and fade margin, and connect SNR to MCS rates on 802.11ax/be. Then you go hands-on with spectrum analysis — Ekahau Sidekick 2 spectrum view and controller-side spectrum data — to identify non-Wi-Fi interferers, evaluate DFS behaviour on 5 GHz, and understand 6 GHz PSC channels and AFC constraints.

You will be able to
  • Learner can compute a full link budget (Tx power, antenna gain, FSPL, obstruction loss, fade margin) and predict RSSI at a client location within stated tolerance
  • Learner can map SNR and channel width to achievable MCS/data rates on Wi-Fi 6/6E clients and explain the airtime consequences
  • Learner can capture and interpret spectrum sweeps to classify non-Wi-Fi interference (microwave, BLE, cordless, video) by duty cycle and signature
  • Learner can explain DFS radar-event behaviour and design channel plans that account for DFS fallback and 6 GHz PSC scanning
Graded labs
Lab

Link Budget vs Reality

Compute predicted RSSI for six measurement points on a real floor, then walk the floor with a Sidekick and reconcile predicted vs measured values, documenting every source of error.

Lab

Interferer Hunt

Given a floor with three hidden non-Wi-Fi interference sources, use spectrum analysis to locate and classify each by FFT signature and duty cycle, and quantify the airtime impact on the affected channel.

Link-budget worksheet (xlsx)Spectrum signature reference card6 GHz PSC/AFC cheat sheet
RCWP-M02

Predictive Design & Site Survey Methodology

The core professional workflow: requirements gathering, predictive modelling and field validation. You learn to interrogate stakeholders for real requirements (device mix, density, applications, roaming zones), build calibrated predictive models in Ekahau AI Pro with correct wall attenuation values, and then validate with AP-on-a-stick, passive and active survey techniques. Coverage targets are engineered per-application: -65 dBm primary/-67 dBm secondary for voice, 25 dB SNR, secondary coverage for roaming and location services.

You will be able to
  • Learner can translate a business requirements interview into quantified RF design targets (RSSI, SNR, capacity, secondary coverage) per coverage area
  • Learner can build a calibrated Ekahau AI Pro predictive model, including measured wall attenuation, correct AP/antenna models and mounting heights
  • Learner can execute AP-on-a-stick surveys to validate propagation assumptions before committing an AP bill of materials
  • Learner can run passive and active (iPerf-based) validation surveys and present pass/fail heatmaps against the design requirements
  • Learner can produce a survey report distinguishing design intent, measured reality and remediation actions
Graded labs
Lab

Requirements to Model

From a recorded stakeholder interview and floor plan for a 4,500 m² office, extract requirements and build a complete Ekahau predictive design with per-area target justification.

Lab

AP-on-a-Stick Validation

Stage an AP at three candidate mount points, survey each, and use the measured propagation to correct the predictive model's wall attenuation values.

Lab

Passive + Active Survey

Perform a full passive survey plus active iPerf3 throughput survey of a live deployment, then produce a validation report with annotated heatmaps showing where the deployment meets or misses spec.

Requirements interview checklistEkahau project template with RKR reporting profileSurvey rig setup guide
RCWP-M03

High-Density & Capacity Design

Designing for people-per-square-metre instead of coverage. You model airtime demand from application throughput and device capabilities, size cells with directional antennas and power reduction, and build channel-reuse plans that survive 500 devices in one hall. Covers auditoriums, training floors, town-hall spaces and dense open offices; band steering, 20/40/80 MHz width trade-offs, minimum basic-rate manipulation, OFDMA/MU-MIMO realities on Wi-Fi 6/6E, and when to lean on 6 GHz for clean spectrum.

You will be able to
  • Learner can compute per-cell airtime demand from device count, application profile and expected MCS, and derive required AP count mathematically
  • Learner can design an HD channel-reuse plan (channel width, Tx power, minimum basic rates) that controls co-channel interference in a single open volume
  • Learner can select and justify directional/internal antenna choices and mounting strategies (overhead, side, under-seat) for a 400+ seat venue
  • Learner can configure and verify band steering, airtime fairness and client-load-balancing behaviour on AOS-10
Graded labs
Lab

Auditorium by the Numbers

Design a 450-seat auditorium WLAN from a capacity worksheet: airtime math, AP count, antenna selection and channel plan, defended in a 15-minute design review with an RKR examiner.

Lab

HD Stress Validation

On the RKR lab floor, generate synthetic high-density load with a client-emulation rig, then measure per-client throughput and airtime utilisation before and after applying your HD tuning profile.

HD capacity calculation workbookAntenna pattern reference libraryVenue design pattern playbook
RCWP-M04

Enterprise WLAN Security: WPA3, 802.1X & EAP

Full-stack enterprise Wi-Fi security built against a live RADIUS/NAC environment. You implement WPA3-Enterprise (including 192-bit mode), SAE and transition modes, OWE for guest, and the complete 802.1X/EAP machinery: EAP-TLS with a real PKI (certificate templates, SCEP/EST enrolment), PEAP-MSCHAPv2 and its deprecation path, and Aruba ClearPass policy services with role derivation and dynamic segmentation. You capture and read the 4-way handshake and EAP exchanges in Wireshark rather than trusting green checkmarks.

You will be able to
  • Learner can deploy WPA3-Enterprise with EAP-TLS end to end: CA setup, client certificate enrolment, ClearPass service configuration and AOS-10 SSID binding
  • Learner can design SSID security architecture across employee, BYOD, IoT (MPSK) and guest (OWE/captive portal) use cases with role-based enforcement
  • Learner can decode a 4-way handshake and full EAP-TLS exchange in Wireshark and identify where a failing authentication breaks
  • Learner can articulate WPA3-SAE protections (offline dictionary resistance, PMF) versus WPA2-PSK and plan a transition-mode migration
  • Learner can implement dynamic segmentation/user-based tunneling so client roles map to wired policy
Graded labs
Lab

EAP-TLS from Zero

Stand up a lab CA, enrol client certificates, build the ClearPass EAP-TLS service with role mapping, and prove authentication with an annotated Wireshark capture of the full exchange.

Lab

Broken Auth Triage

Six client onboarding failures (expired cert, wrong intermediate, RADIUS timeout, PMF mismatch, wrong role, clock skew) — diagnose each from captures and ClearPass Access Tracker in under 15 minutes apiece.

Lab

IoT & Guest Segmentation

Deploy MPSK for headless IoT devices and an OWE-based guest network, verifying with captures that guest traffic is encrypted and IoT roles are segmented from the employee VLAN.

ClearPass policy design templateEAP exchange annotated capture setSSID security decision tree
RCWP-M05

Fast Secure Roaming: 802.11r/k/v & Client Behaviour

Roaming is where good designs die in production. This module dissects the roaming decision — which the CLIENT makes, not the AP — and the standards that assist it: 802.11k neighbor reports, 802.11v BSS transition management, 802.11r FT over-the-air/over-the-DS, plus OKC and PMK caching. You capture real roams from voice handsets and laptops, time the reassociation gap, hunt sticky clients, and learn which combinations break which legacy clients (and how to scope 11r safely).

You will be able to
  • Learner can explain and identify each roaming mechanism (11k/11v/11r FT, OKC, PMKID caching) from a packet capture
  • Learner can measure roam latency from capture timestamps and verify FT roams complete under 50 ms against full 802.1X reauthentication baselines
  • Learner can diagnose sticky-client and ping-pong roaming from RSSI traces and design cell overlap (secondary coverage at -67 to -70 dBm) that promotes clean roams
  • Learner can plan 11r deployment safely, including handling clients that fail to parse FT information elements
Graded labs
Lab

Roam Capture Clinic

Using a multi-channel capture rig, record a Wi-Fi voice handset roaming across three APs with and without 802.11r enabled; measure and compare reassociation latency and document the FT exchange frame by frame.

Lab

Sticky Client Autopsy

Given a problem report and a 20-minute capture from a warehouse deployment, prove why the handheld scanner clings to a distant AP and prescribe the design and configuration fix (cell overlap, min-rate, 11v steering).

Roaming standards field guideMulti-channel capture rig procedureKnown client-compatibility matrix
RCWP-M06

QoS, WMM & Real-Time Applications over Wi-Fi

Engineering deterministic behaviour on a contention-based medium. You go deep on WMM access categories and EDCA parameters, DSCP-to-UP mapping and the trust boundary between wired and wireless QoS, and end-to-end marking for Teams/Zoom/Wi-Fi calling. Covers UAPSD power save for voice handsets, airtime fairness, call-quality measurement (MOS, jitter, loss) and validating a voice-grade WLAN with live call testing rather than assumptions.

You will be able to
  • Learner can map application DSCP markings to WMM access categories correctly and verify the marking survives end to end with captures on both wired and wireless sides
  • Learner can explain EDCA contention parameters (AIFS, CWmin/CWmax, TXOP) per access category and predict behaviour under congestion
  • Learner can design a voice-over-Wi-Fi service (coverage, roaming, QoS, UAPSD) meeting jitter <30 ms, loss <1% and one-way delay targets
  • Learner can validate real-time application quality with active call testing and interpret MOS/R-factor results
Graded labs
Lab

End-to-End Marking Audit

Trace a Teams call's DSCP/UP markings across client, air, AP, tunnel and wired uplink with synchronized captures, find where markings are lost, and fix the trust configuration.

Lab

Voice-Grade Sign-off

Tune and then certify a lab WLAN for voice: run scripted roam-while-calling tests with synthetic RTP streams, measure jitter/loss/MOS per roam, and produce a signed validation report.

DSCP/WMM mapping referenceVoice readiness checklistRTP test-stream toolkit
RCWP-M07

Controller & Cloud Architecture: AOS-10, Central and RF Operations

The platform module, taught at ACMP depth on HPE Aruba Networking gear. Architecture choices — AOS-10 bridged vs tunneled vs mixed forwarding, gateway clusters, campus vs microbranch — and the operational RF machinery: AirMatch channel/power optimization, ClientMatch steering, Live Upgrades and AI Insights in Central. You learn what the automation actually does under the hood so you can decide when to trust it and when to pin channels manually (and the equivalents on Cisco/Juniper Mist are mapped so the skills transfer).

You will be able to
  • Learner can select and justify forwarding architecture (bridged/tunneled per-SSID, gateway cluster sizing and redundancy) for a given campus design
  • Learner can explain how AirMatch computes its channel/EIRP solution and identify deployments where its assumptions fail (HD venues, DFS-heavy sites)
  • Learner can operate Aruba Central at professional level: config hierarchies, templates vs UI groups, firmware compliance and Live Upgrade orchestration
  • Learner can interpret ClientMatch steering events and AI Insights anomalies and translate them into design or config actions
Graded labs
Lab

Two-Architecture Build

Deploy the same three-AP site twice on the RKR rack — once bridged with local VLANs, once tunneled through a gateway cluster with role-based policy — and document the failure-domain and policy trade-offs of each.

Lab

AirMatch Under the Microscope

Introduce a deliberate interference and co-channel scenario, capture the pre/post AirMatch RF plan from Central, and evaluate whether the computed solution matches what your own channel-plan math says it should be.

AOS-10 architecture decision matrixCentral operations runbookCross-vendor concept map (Aruba/Cisco/Mist)
RCWP-M08

WLAN Validation, Troubleshooting & the RCWP Capstone

The integration module. A structured troubleshooting methodology (OSI-up from RF: spectrum → association → authentication → network services → application) applied to compound faults, then the capstone: a complete design-and-validate engagement for a realistic multi-floor client brief — predictive design, security architecture, HD zones, roaming domains, QoS — delivered as a professional design package and defended in a live review. The capstone package becomes the verifiable evidence attached to your RCWP credential.

You will be able to
  • Learner can apply a layered WLAN troubleshooting methodology to compound faults spanning RF, authentication and network services, documenting evidence at each elimination step
  • Learner can assemble a complete professional design package: requirements, predictive model, BOM, channel/power plan, security architecture, validation plan and acceptance criteria
  • Learner can defend design decisions under adversarial questioning from a technical reviewer, citing measurements and standards behaviour rather than vendor defaults
  • Learner can define measurable acceptance criteria a customer can use to sign off a WLAN deployment
Graded labs
Lab

Compound Fault Gauntlet

A timed 3-hour scenario on the remote rack: a 'customer escalation' with four interacting faults (DFS event, DHCP exhaustion, expired RADIUS cert, mis-tuned min-rate) — restore full service and submit a root-cause timeline.

Lab

RCWP Capstone: Design & Defend

Full engagement for a two-building, 900-user brief with an HD training centre and voice requirement: deliver the predictive design, security and roaming architecture, and validation plan, then defend it in a 30-minute graded review board.

Troubleshooting methodology flowchartDesign package template (RKR standard)Capstone grading rubric

How you’re examined

The RCWP exam format.

Two-part proctored assessment. Part 1 — Theory (90 minutes, 70 items): scenario-based questions on RF math and link budgets, survey methodology, HD capacity design, WPA3/EAP security, 802.11r/k/v roaming and WMM/QoS; includes exhibit questions built on real Ekahau heatmaps and Wireshark captures; pass mark 72%. Part 2 — Practical Lab Exam (4 hours, live-proctored on RKR's remote rack + survey dataset): candidates receive a floor plan, client/device profile and business requirements, and must (a) produce a predictive design in Ekahau AI Pro meeting stated coverage (-65 dBm primary / -67 dBm secondary), SNR and capacity targets, (b) configure WPA3-Enterprise with EAP-TLS against ClearPass on an AOS-10 environment, (c) enable and prove 802.11r/k/v behaviour from a supplied roaming capture, and (d) submit a validation report defending every design decision. Graded against a published rubric by RKR examiners; minimum 75% with no domain below 60%. Certification includes a verifiable digital credential linked to the graded lab artifacts.

Career plan

Where the RCWP takes you.

RCWP is engineered for the mid-to-senior jump in India's wireless market: from executing tickets on someone else's WLAN to owning design, security and validation for enterprise deployments at GCCs, system integrators and managed-service providers. Because every RCWP holder graduates with a graded design package and capture evidence, the credential shortcuts the 'show me you've actually done a survey' screen that filters most candidates out of design roles.

Roles unlocked
Wireless Network Engineer (design-capable)Senior WLAN Engineer / Wi-Fi SMEWireless Deployment / Site Survey LeadNetwork Consultant - Mobility (SI/GCC)Pre-sales Wireless Solutions Engineer
Salary band
Rs 8-24 LPA (mid to senior wireless roles; niche RF design skills command up to a 1.7x premium over generic network engineering)
Entry point (post-RCWA)
Wireless Network Engineer
Rs 8-14 LPA
1-2 years post-RCWP
Senior Wireless Engineer / Wi-Fi SME
Rs 14-20 LPA
2-4 years post-RCWP
WLAN Design & Deployment Lead
Rs 18-26 LPA
Next: RCWE (Expert tier)
Wireless Consultant / Mobility Architect track
Rs 24-30+ LPA
Demand signal

June 2026: with India's AI-skills gap running at ~53% and 73% of infrastructure operators reporting network operations roles hard to fill, wireless design remains one of the scarcest specialisations — SIs and GCCs building out Wi-Fi 6E/7 campuses report niche RF/design engineers commanding a ~1.7x pay premium over generic network engineers, and the datacenter build-out (from ~1,700 MW toward 5-6.5 GW, ~100k new infrastructure jobs by 2030) is pulling experienced campus engineers upstream, widening the vacuum at the WLAN design tier.

8 modules. 18 graded labs. One verifiable credential.

14 weeks at 9 hours a week — proven at the lab pod, scored against a published rubric.

Compare all certifications